Original Article

Comparison of the Quality of Pediatric Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Both Nursing and Medical Journals: Adherence to the CONSORT Statement

Corresponding Author

Flora Devos MSc

Nurse

[email protected]

orcid.org/0000-0003-2226-8959

Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation in Children and Pregnant Women, Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France

Clinical research Unit, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris : Necker Hospital, Paris, France

Address correspondence to Flora Devos, Necker Hospital, IMAGNE, 149 rue de Sèvres, 75015 Paris, France; [email protected]Search for more papers by this author

Nour Ibrahim MD, MSc,

Nour Ibrahim MD, MSc

Doctor of medicine

Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation in Children and Pregnant Women, Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France

Clinical research Unit, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris : Necker Hospital, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author

Frantz Foissac PhD,

Frantz Foissac PhD

Biostatistician

Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation in Children and Pregnant Women, Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France

Clinical research Unit, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris : Necker Hospital, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author

Naim Bouazza PhD,

Naim Bouazza PhD

Biostatistician

Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation in Children and Pregnant Women, Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France

Clinical research Unit, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris : Necker Hospital, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author

Pierre-Yves Ancel PhD, MD,

Pierre-Yves Ancel PhD, MD

Doctor of medicine

Clinical Research Unit, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris : Cochin Hotel-Dieu Hospital, Paris, France

INSERM, Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne, Paris Cité Research Center, Obstetrical, Perinatal, and Pediatric Epidemiology Group, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author

Hélène Chappuy PhD, MD,

Hélène Chappuy PhD, MD

Doctor of medicine

Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation in Children and Pregnant Women, Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France

Pediatric Emergency Department, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris : Armand Trousseau Hospital, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author

Caroline Elie PhD, MD,

Caroline Elie PhD, MD

Doctor of medicine

Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation in Children and Pregnant Women, Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France

Clinical research Unit, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris : Necker Hospital, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author

Jean-Marc Tréluyer PhD, MD,

Jean-Marc Tréluyer PhD, MD

Doctor of medicine

Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation in Children and Pregnant Women, Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France

Clinical research Unit, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris : Necker Hospital, Paris, France

Clinical Research Unit, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris : Cochin Hotel-Dieu Hospital, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author

Flora Devos MSc,

Corresponding Author

Flora Devos MSc

Nurse

[email protected]

orcid.org/0000-0003-2226-8959

Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation in Children and Pregnant Women, Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France

Clinical research Unit, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris : Necker Hospital, Paris, France

Address correspondence to Flora Devos, Necker Hospital, IMAGNE, 149 rue de Sèvres, 75015 Paris, France; [email protected]Search for more papers by this author

Nour Ibrahim MD, MSc,

Nour Ibrahim MD, MSc

Doctor of medicine

Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation in Children and Pregnant Women, Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France

Clinical research Unit, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris : Necker Hospital, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author

Frantz Foissac PhD,

Frantz Foissac PhD

Biostatistician

Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation in Children and Pregnant Women, Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France

Clinical research Unit, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris : Necker Hospital, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author

Naim Bouazza PhD,

Naim Bouazza PhD

Biostatistician

Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation in Children and Pregnant Women, Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France

Clinical research Unit, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris : Necker Hospital, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author

Pierre-Yves Ancel PhD, MD,

Pierre-Yves Ancel PhD, MD

Doctor of medicine

Clinical Research Unit, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris : Cochin Hotel-Dieu Hospital, Paris, France

INSERM, Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne, Paris Cité Research Center, Obstetrical, Perinatal, and Pediatric Epidemiology Group, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author

Hélène Chappuy PhD, MD,

Hélène Chappuy PhD, MD

Doctor of medicine

Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation in Children and Pregnant Women, Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France

Pediatric Emergency Department, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris : Armand Trousseau Hospital, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author

Caroline Elie PhD, MD,

Caroline Elie PhD, MD

Doctor of medicine

Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation in Children and Pregnant Women, Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France

Clinical research Unit, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris : Necker Hospital, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author

Jean-Marc Tréluyer PhD, MD,

Jean-Marc Tréluyer PhD, MD

Doctor of medicine

Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation in Children and Pregnant Women, Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France

Clinical research Unit, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris : Necker Hospital, Paris, France

Clinical Research Unit, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris : Cochin Hotel-Dieu Hospital, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author

First published: 15 October 2018

https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12329

Citations: 12

We would like to thank the authors who agreed to share their articles for this study. We are also grateful to the Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) and all members of the Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation in Children and Pregnant Women EA 7323 group for their advice and support.

Share a link

Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Wechat

Abstract

Background

Nursing care should be based on scientific evidence. However, studies must be performed rigorously with accurate reporting for their findings to be applicable to practice. Since the body of scientific nursing literature is broad, the quality and validity of its findings should be regularly controlled and verified to ensure their application and their practical impact.

Purpose

To compare reporting quality of pediatric randomized controlled trial (RCT) articles in nursing and medical journals.

Methods

Randomly selected articles were reviewed and scored to assess the number of CONSORT items that were adequately reported, generating a CONSORT score. The CONSORT scores for 28 items were compared between the two journal types.

Results and Discussion

The CONSORT scores by journal type were not significantly different: (19.2 [16.2; 22] for medical journals and 19.5 [16.1; 21.5] for nursing journals, p = .77). The reporting of CONSORT items was poor for both journal types. However, there were two significant differences: item 19 (Declaration of all important harm or unintended effects, p = .0006) and item 23 (Registration number of the study, p = .0003), were reported more often in medical journals. The adherence of journals to the CONSORT statement and large sample size was associated with better quality of the reporting of studies.

Conclusions

Based on reporting quality, nursing studies have the same scientific credibility and rigor as medical studies in the pediatric field.

Linking Evidence to Action

The findings of this study could help researchers improve the reporting of their studies and highlight the importance of reporting quality for future knowledge transfer and practical use. The quality of research and its reporting is necessary to improve knowledge transfer into practice.

Supporting Information

References

Adie, S., Harris, I. A., Naylor, J. M., & Mittal, R. (2013). CONSORT compliance in surgical randomized trials: Are we there yet? A systematic review Annals of Surgery, 258(6), 872–878.
10.1097/SLA.0b013e31829664b9
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., Moher, D., Egger, M., Davidoff, F., Elbourne, D., … Lang, T. (2001). The Revised CONSORT Statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine, 134(8), 663–694. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00012
10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00012
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Begg, C., Cho, M., Eastwood, S., Horton, R., Moher, D., Olkin, I., … Stroup, D. F. (1996). Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: The CONSORT statement. Journal of the American Medical Association, 276(8), 637–639.
10.1001/jama.1996.03540080059030
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Bench, S., Day, T., & Metcalfe, A. (2013). Randomised controlled trials: An introduction for nurse researchers. Nurse Researcher, 20(5), 38–44.
10.7748/nr2013.05.20.5.38.e312
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J. A. (2005). The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT): Guidelines for reporting randomized trials. Nursing Research, 54(2), 128–132.
10.1097/00006199-200503000-00007
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Bigelow, A., Power, M., MacLellan-Peters, J., Alex, M., & McDonald, C. (2012). Effect of mother/infant skin-to-skin contact on postpartum depressive symptoms and maternal physiological stress. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 41(3), 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.2012.01350.x
10.1111/j.1552-6909.2012.01350.x
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Chen, Z., Chen, Y., Zeng, J., Wang, Y., Ye, T., Zhou, Q., … Ding, Z. (2015). Quality of randomized controlled trials reporting in the treatment of melasma conducted in China. Trials, 16, 156. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0677-2
10.1186/s13063-015-0677-2
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Cochrane, A. (1972). Effectiveness and efficiency: Random reflections on health services. London, UK: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust.
Google Scholar
Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2007). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Franck, L. S., Oulton, K., & Bruce, E. (2012). Parental involvement in neonatal pain management: An empirical and conceptual update. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 44(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2011.01434.x
10.1111/j.1547-5069.2011.01434.x
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Gabriel, S. E., & Normand, S.-L. T. (2012). Getting the methods right—The foundation of patient-centered outcomes research. The New England Journal of Medicine, 367(9), 787–790. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1207437
10.1056/NEJMp1207437
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Guo, J.-W., Sward, K. A., Beck, S. L., & Staggers, N. (2014). Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials in cancer nursing research. Nursing Research, 63(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000007
10.1097/NNR.0000000000000007
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Huwiler-Müntener, K., Jüni, P., Junker, C., & Egger, M. (2002). Quality of reporting of randomized trials as a measure of methodologic quality. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287(21), 2801–2804.
10.1001/jama.287.21.2801
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Ingersoll, G. L. (2000). Evidence-based nursing: What it is and what it isn't. Nursing Outlook, 48(4), 151–152. https://doi.org/10.1067/mno.2000.107690
10.1067/mno.2000.107690
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Jadad, A. R., Moore, R. A., Carroll, D., Jenkinson, C., Reynolds, D. J., Gavaghan, D. J., & McQuay, H. J. (1996). Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? Controlled Clinical Trials, 17(1), 1–12.
10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4
CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
Jiang, H., Li, M., Wen, L. M., Hu, Q., Yang, D., He, G., … Qian, X. (2014). Effect of short message service on infant feeding practice: Findings from a community-based study in Shanghai, China. Journal of the American Medical Association Pediatrics, 168(5), 471. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.58
Google Scholar
Karri, V. (2006). Randomised clinical trials in plastic surgery: Survey of output and quality of reporting. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 59(8), 787–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2005.11.027
10.1016/j.bjps.2005.11.027
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Klem, M. L., & Weiss, P. M. (2005). Evidence-based resources and the role of librarians in developing evidence-based practice curricula. Journal of Professional Nursing, 21(6), 380–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.10.004
10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.10.004
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Klem, M. L., & Weiss, P. M. (2018). Do nursing students need instruction in both CINAHL and MEDLINE? HSLS update. Retrieved from http://info.hsls.pitt.edu/updatereport/?p=6886
Google Scholar
Lee, S.-Y., Teoh, P. J., Camm, C. F., & Agha, R. A. (2013). Compliance of randomized controlled trials in trauma surgery with the CONSORT statement. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 75(4), 562–572. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3182a5399e
10.1097/TA.0b013e3182a5399e
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Lempesi, E., Koletsi, D., Fleming, P. S., & Pandis, N. (2014). The reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in orthodontics. Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice, 14(2), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2013.12.001
10.1016/j.jebdp.2013.12.001
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Moher, D., Hopewell, S., Schulz, K. F., Montori, V., Gøtzsche, P. C., Devereaux, P. J., … Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Group (2010). CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(8), e1–e37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.004
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.004
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Moher, D., Jadad, A. R., Nichol, G., Penman, M., Tugwell, P., & Walsh, S. (1995). Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists. Controlled Clinical Trials, 16(1), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(94)00031-W
10.1016/0197-2456(94)00031-W
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Moher, D., Jones, A., Lepage, L., & For The CONSORT Group (2001). Use of the consort statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: A comparative before-and-after evaluation. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(15), 1992–1995. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.15.1992
10.1001/jama.285.15.1992
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Moss, R. L., Henry, M. C. W., Dimmitt, R. A., Rangel, S., Geraghty, N., & Skarsgard, E. D. (2001). The role of prospective randomized clinical trials in pediatric surgery: State of the art? Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 36(8), 1182–1186. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2001.25749
10.1053/jpsu.2001.25749
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Parent, N., & Hanley, J. A. (2009). Assessing quality of reports on randomized clinical trials in nursing journals. Journal Canadien En Soins Infirmiers Cardio-Vasculaires (Canadian Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing), 19(2), 25–39.
Google Scholar
Reed, P. G. (2016). Epistemic authority in nursing practice vs. doctors’ orders. Nursing Science Quarterly, 29(3), 241–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318416647356
10.1177/0894318416647356
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Sibbald, B., & Roland, M. (1998). Understanding controlled trials: Why are randomised controlled trials important? BMJ, 316(7126), 201. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7126.201
10.1136/bmj.316.7126.201
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Sjögren, P., & Halling, A. (2002). Quality of reporting randomised clinical trials in dental and medical research. British Dental Journal, 192(2), 100–103. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801304
10.1038/sj.bdj.4801304
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Smith, B. A., Lee, H.-J., Lee, J. H., Choi, M., Jones, D. E., Bausell, R. B., & Broome, M. E. (2008). Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature: Application of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT). Nursing Outlook, 56(1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2007.09.002
10.1016/j.outlook.2007.09.002
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Thomson, D., Hartling, L., Cohen, E., Vandermeer, B., Tjosvold, L., & Klassen, T. P. (2010). Controlled trials in children: Quantity, methodological quality and descriptive characteristics of pediatric controlled trials published 1948–2006. PLoS One, 5(9), e13106. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013106
10.1371/journal.pone.0013106
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
To, M. J., Jones, J., Emara, M., & Jadad, A. R. (2013). Are reports of randomized controlled trials improving over time? A systematic review of 284 articles published in high-impact general and specialized medical journals. PLoS One, 8(12), e84779. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084779
10.1371/journal.pone.0084779
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Turner, L., Shamseer, L., Altman, D. G., Weeks, L., Peters, J., Kober, T., … Moher, D. (2012). Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 11, MR000030. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000030.pub2
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
Walleser, S., Hill, S. R., & Bero, L. A. (2011). Characteristics and quality of reporting of cluster randomized trials in children: Reporting needs improvement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(12), 1331–1340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.006
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.006
PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar

Citing Literature

Volume15, Issue6

December 2018

Pages 447-454

Comparison of the Quality of Pediatric Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Both Nursing and Medical Journals: Adherence to the CONSORT Statement

Abstract

Background

Purpose

Methods

Results and Discussion

Conclusions

Linking Evidence to Action

Supporting Information

References

Citing Literature

References

Information

RESOURCES

RESOURCES

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

Comparison of the Quality of Pediatric Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Both Nursing and Medical Journals: Adherence to the CONSORT Statement

Abstract

Background

Purpose

Methods

Results and Discussion

Conclusions

Linking Evidence to Action

Supporting Information

References

Citing Literature

References

Related

Information

RESOURCES

RESOURCES