Volume 35, Issue 2 p. 171-176

Couples' Views of the Effects of Natural Family Planning on Marital Dynamics

Leona VandeVusse

Leona VandeVusse

Leona VandeVusse, RN, PhD, CNM, FACNM, Delta Gamma , Associate Professor & Director, Nurse-Midwifery Program, at the College of Nursing, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI

Search for more papers by this author
Lisa Hanson

Lisa Hanson

Lisa Hanson, RN, DNSc, CNM, Delta Gamma , Associate Professor, at the College of Nursing, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI

Search for more papers by this author
Richard J. Fehring

Corresponding Author

Richard J. Fehring

Richard J. Fehring, RN, DNSc, Delta Gamma , Professor & Director, Institute for Natural Family Planning, at the College of Nursing, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI

Dr. Fehring, Marquette University College of Nursing, P.O. Box 1881, Milwaukee, WI 53201–1881. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Amy Newman

Amy Newman

Amy Newman, RN, MSN, CPNP, CPON, Delta Gamma , Advanced Practice Nurse for Hematology/Oncology/Transplant Services, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI

Search for more papers by this author
Jaime Fox

Jaime Fox

Jaime Fox, BS, RN, Delta Gamma , Research Assistant, Graduate Nurse Practitioner Student, College of Nursing, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 April 2004
Citations: 18

The authors thank Sue Ek, Billings Ovulation Method Association USA, for her help in obtaining respondents. This study was supported by a grant from Sigma Theta Tau International and by Grant Number 5D09HP00141-02 from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Abstract

Purpose: Natural Family Planning (NFP) requires periodic abstinence and partner cooperation to prevent pregnancy. The aim of this study was to learn about the effects of modern NFP methods on marital relationships.

Design: Descriptive survey.

Methods: Questionnaires were mailed to 1,400 randomly selected couples known to use NFP and residing in the United States of America; 334 couples (24%) responded. Content analysis was used to identify meanings and themes. Numeric analyses were used to determine frequencies.

Findings: Nearly two-thirds of the qualitative comments were positive. Four themes were identified in the positive responses: relationship enhancements, knowledge improvements, spirituality enrichments, and method successes. Three negative themes were identified: strained sexual interactions, worsened relationships, and method problems. Although about onefourth of the comments indicated that NFP presented challenges, the majority (74%) found it beneficial, often resulting in stronger bonds, better communication, and improved knowledge.

Conclusions: NFP had more positive than negative effects and its use warrants further consideration.