The Point of Triangulation
Corresponding Author
Veronica A. Thurmond
Veronica A. Thurmond, MAJ, AN, RN, MS, Delta , Doctoral Student, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
Ms. Thurmond. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Veronica A. Thurmond
Veronica A. Thurmond, MAJ, AN, RN, MS, Delta , Doctoral Student, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
Ms. Thurmond. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorThe author acknowledges the assistance of Dr. Ann Kuckelman Cobb. The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, the Departments of Defense, or the U. S. Government.
Abstract
Purpose: To explore various types of triangulation strategies and to indicate when different types of triangulation should be used in research.
Methods: Reviews included literature on triangulation and multimethod strategies published since 1960 and research books specifically focusing on triangulation.
Findings: Triangulation is the combination of at least two or more theoretical perspectives, methodological approaches, data sources, investigators, or data analysis methods. The intent of using triangulation is to decrease, negate, or counterbalance the deficiency of a single strategy, thereby increasing the ability to interpret the findings.
Conclusions: The use of triangulation strategies does not strengthen a flawed study. Researchers should use triangulation if it can contribute to understanding the phenomenon; however, they must be able to articulate why the strategy is being used and how it might enhance the study.
References
- Anderson, L. (1997). The introduction of generic workers into the ward team: An exploratory study. Journal of Nursing Management, 5(2), 69–75.
- Banik, B.J. (1993). Applying triangulation in nursing research. Applied Nursing Research, 6(1), 47–52.
- Barbour, R.S. (1998). Mixing qualitative methods: Quality assurance or qualitative quagmire Qualitative Health Research, 8(3), 352–361.
- Beck, C.T. (1997). Developing a research program using qualitative and quantitative approaches. Nursing Outlook, 45(6), 265–269.
- Boyd, C.O. (2000). Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. In P.L. Munhall & C.O. Boyd (Eds.), Nursing research: A qualitative perspective ( 2nd ed., 454–475). Boston : Jones & Bartlett.
- Breitmayer, B.J., Ayres, L., & Knafl, K.A. (1993). Triangulation in qualitative research: Evaluation of completeness and confirmation purposes. Image:Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 25, 237–243.
- E. Britannica (Ed.). (2000). Triangulation[On-line]. Available: http://www.britannica.com
- Buchanan, D.R. (1992). An uneasy alliance: Combining qualitative and quantitative research method. Health Education Quarterly, 19(1), 117–135.
- Burns, N., & Grove, S.K. (1993). The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique and utilization ( 2nd ed.). Philadelphia : W.B. Saunders.
- Burr, G. (1998). Contextualizing critical care family needs through triangulation: An Australian study. Intensive & Critical Care Nursing, 14(4), 161–169.
- Campbell, D.T., & Fiske, D.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminate validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105.
- Cobb, A.K. (2000). Acculturation and accommodation in qualitative and quantitative research. Journal of Professional Nursing, 16(4), 188.
- Connelly, L.M., Bott, M., Hoffart, N., & Taunton, R.L. (1997). Methodological triangulation in a study of nurse retention. Nursing Research, 46(5), 299–302.
- Denzin, N.K. (1970). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Chicago : Aldine.
- Duffy, M.E. (1987). Methodological triangulation: A vehicle for merging quantitative and qualitative research methods. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 19, 130–133.
- Dzurec, L.C., & Abraham, I.L. (1993). The nature of inquiry: Linking quantitative and qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science, 16(1), 73–79.
-
Fielding, N.G., &
Fielding, J.L. (1986). Linking data (Vol. 4).
Beverly Hills
,
CA
: Sage.
10.4135/9781412984775 Google Scholar
- Floyd, J.A. (1993). The use of across-method triangulation in the study of sleep concerns in healthy older adults. Advances in Nursing Science, 16(2), 70–80.
- Foster, R.L. (1997). Addressing epistemologic and practical issues in multimethod research: a procedure for conceptual triangulation. Advances in Nursing Science, 20(2), 1–12.
- Goodwin, L.D., & Goodwin, W.L. (1984). Qualitative vs. quantitative research or qualitative and quantitative research Nursing Research, 33(6), 378–380.
- Greene, J.C., & Caracelli, V.J. (1997). Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
- Hinds, P.S. (1989). Method triangulation to index change in clinical phenomena. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 11(4), 440–447.
- Jick, T.D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602–611.
- Kimchi, J., Polivka, B., & Stevenson, J.S. (1991). Triangulation: Operational definitions. Nursing Research, 40(6), 364–366.
- Knafl, K., Breitmayer, B., Gallo, A., & Zoeller, L. (1996). Family response to childhood chronic illness: Description of management styles. Journal of Pediatric Nursing: Nursing Care of Children & Families, 11(5), 315–326.
-
Lincoln, Y.S., &
Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry.
Newbury Park
,
CA
: Sage.
10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8 Google Scholar
- Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research ( 2nd ed., 163–188). Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage.
- Mitchell, E.S. (1986). Multiple triangulation: A methodology for nursing science. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(3), 18–26.
- Morse, J.M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40(2), 120–123.
- Nolan, M., & Behi, R. (1995). Triangulation: The best of all worlds British Journal of Nursing, 4(14), 829–832.
- Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods ( 2nd ed.). Newbury Park , CA : Sage.
- Polit, D.F., & Hungler, B.P. (1995). Nursing research: Principles and methods ( 6th ed.). Philadelphia : Lippincott.
- Porter, E.J. (1989). The qualitative-quantitative dualism. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 21(2), 98–102.
- Proctor, S. (1998). Linking philosophy and method in the research process: The case for realism. Nurse Researcher, 5(4), 73–90.
- Shih, F.J. (1998). Triangulation in nursing research: Issues of conceptual clarity and purpose. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28(3), 631–641.
- Sohier, R. (1988). Multiple triangulation and contemporary nursing research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 10(6), 732–742.
- Streubert, H.J., & Carpenter, D.R. (1999). Qualitative research in nursing:Advancing the humanistic imperative ( 2nd ed.). Philadelphia : Lippincott.
- Warms, C., & Schroeder, C. (1999). Bridging the gulf between science and action: The “New Fuzzies” of neopragmatism. Advances in Nursing Science, 22(2), 1–10.
- Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary. (1980). Springfield , MA : G.&C. Merriam.
-
Wilson, H.S., &
Hutchinson, S.A. (1991). Triangulation of qualitative methods: Heideggerian hermeneutics and grounded theory.
Qualitative Health Research, 1(2), 263–276.
10.1177/104973239100100206 Google Scholar
- Woods, N.F., & Catanzaro, M. (1988). Nursing research: Theory and practice. St. Louis , MO : Mosby.